Measurement Tracking Sheet
Same tape, same time of day, three readings averaged. The trend is the signal; the single number is not.
BFCBrilliance · bfcbrilliance.com/tools/body-fat-calculator
Baseline
- Date
- Formula used
- Height (in)
- Weight (lb)
- Neck
- Waist
- Hip (women)
- BODY FAT %
- Fat mass
- Lean mass
Track it monthly — three readings each, averaged
| Date | Weight | Neck | Waist | Hip | Body fat % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The formulas and the sites
- Men
- 86.010·log₁₀(waist−neck) − 70.041·log₁₀(height) + 36.76
- Women
- 163.205·log₁₀(waist+hip−neck) − 97.684·log₁₀(height) − 78.387
- ⚠ UNITS
- INCHES — the metric form has different constants
- ⚠ If a source says cm
- with THESE constants, it is wrong
- Neck
- below the larynx, sloping down at the front, unflexed
- Waist — MEN
- at the navel
- Waist — WOMEN
- narrowest point, usually ABOVE the navel
- Hip
- widest point, feet together
- When
- end of a normal exhale, tape snug not tight
- Half-inch waist error
- ≈1 pp (men) · ≈0.65 pp (women)
- Source
- Hodgdon-Beckett, Naval Health Research Center, 1984
Getting a number worth comparing
- Measuring in INCHES
- Same tape every time
- Same time of day — morning, before eating
- Three readings per site, averaged
- Waist at the correct site for the formula you are using
- Not flexing, not holding breath, not pulling the tape tight
- Weight recorded at the same time
- Comparing against your own last reading, not against a chart
The units trap
These constants are for inches. A separate metric version exists with completely different ones. Push centimetres through the inch formula and it returns a plausible wrong answer — 26.7% for a body that is 20.1%. Nothing errors, nothing looks odd, and the number is six points out.
Track the trend, not the digit
If it says 22% it might really be 19 or 25. But if it says 22 in March and 19 in June, measured the same way both times, something real changed. This is an instrument for detecting change, not a verdict — which is also why measuring technique matters more than the formula does.