Protein Intake Calculator
The 0.8 g/kg RDA is a minimum to avoid deficiency, not a target. If you train, the published range is roughly double it.
Enter your weight and pick the row that describes what you actually do. The per-meal figure is the one worth acting on - the daily total is easy to agree with and hard to hit.
Your details
1.2-2.0 is the 2016 joint position stand's range for physically active people.
Used for the per-meal figure — the number you can actually act on.
Result
Grams. Your weight converted to kg, times the rate you chose.
- Per mealGrams. This is the number to check against a plate.
- 41
- Your weight in kgEvery published protein figure is per kilogram.
- 77.1
- The RDA would beGrams at 0.8 g/kg — the sedentary floor, shown for comparison.
- 62
- Your target vs the RDATimes the RDA. An active target is roughly double it.
- 2
- Calories from that proteinAt 4 kcal per gram. Worth knowing as a share of your day's intake.
- 494
- Active range — low endGrams at 1.2 g/kg.
- 93
- Active range — high endGrams at 2.0 g/kg. The position stand's stated span.
- 154
About this tool
How Much Protein Do I Need?The 0.8 g/kg figure everyone quotes is an RDA — the amount that prevents deficiency. If you train, the published range is roughly double it.
Free download
Protein Target SheetThe published ranges, your own numbers, and a log — because the gap between knowing the target and hitting it is usually breakfast.
Free, no email required — print it or save it as a PDF.
Share it
Protein Intake Calculator infographicThe key numbers as one image — free to save, share, or embed on your own site with credit.
How this is calculated
Protein recommendations are given per kilogram of body weight, so pounds are converted at 2.20462 lb per kg inside the formula. THE PUBLISHED FIGURES: 0.8 g/kg is the RDA for sedentary adults. ⚠️ It is worth understanding what an RDA is: the amount that meets the needs of nearly all healthy people - in other words a floor set to prevent deficiency, not a target for anyone with a goal. Treating it as a recommendation for an athlete is a category error. 1.2 to 2.0 g/kg is the range in the 2016 joint position stand from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada and the American College of Sports Medicine, for physically active people. Within that: 1.2 to 1.6 g/kg is generally cited as sufficient for moderate resistance training and for endurance athletes. 1.6 to 2.2 g/kg is the range cited for maximising muscle protein synthesis when building muscle. So an active person's requirement is roughly DOUBLE the RDA, and the gap between the two figures is the single most common source of confusion on this topic. THE PER-MEAL NUMBER IS THE ACTIONABLE ONE. A daily total is easy to nod at and hard to act on, because you cannot eat it at any particular moment. Dividing by the number of meals you actually eat converts it into something you can check on a plate. Most people who miss their target are not missing it by a lot at the end of the day - they are missing it at breakfast. ⚠️ WEIGHT IS THE INPUT AND IT IS THE ROUGHEST PART. These figures are per kilogram of TOTAL body weight, which is how the position stands express them, but body composition genuinely matters and total weight does not see it. For anyone carrying substantial excess weight, scaling to a target or lean weight is common practice and gives a considerably lower number. This is a question for a dietitian rather than a calculator. What this cannot tell you: whether more protein is useful for YOU, whether it is safe given your kidney function or any other condition, and what you should be eating instead of the protein it displaces. High intakes are generally well tolerated by healthy people, and that sentence contains two conditions a calculator cannot check. It is arithmetic on a published range, not advice.
Common questions
- Why is the RDA so much lower than everything else?
- Because an RDA answers a different question. It is the amount that meets the needs of nearly all healthy people - a floor set to prevent deficiency, not a target for anyone with a goal. 0.8 g/kg is exactly that for protein. The 1.2 to 2.0 range for physically active people comes from a 2016 joint position stand by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada and the American College of Sports Medicine, and it is answering 'what supports training' rather than 'what prevents deficiency'. Reading the RDA as a recommendation for an athlete is a category error, and it is the commonest confusion on this topic.
- What number should I actually use?
- It depends on what you are doing, which is why it is a dropdown rather than a constant. 1.2 to 1.6 g/kg is generally cited as sufficient for moderate resistance training and for endurance athletes; 1.6 to 2.2 is the range cited for maximising muscle protein synthesis when the goal is building muscle. The whole active range is roughly double the RDA. If you are choosing between two adjacent rows, the difference between them is far smaller than the difference between hitting your number and not.
- Why show a per-meal figure?
- Because a daily total is easy to agree with and hard to act on - you cannot eat it at any particular moment. Dividing by the meals you actually eat turns it into something you can check on a plate. Most people who miss their target are not missing it by much at the end of the day; they are missing it at breakfast, which is where protein is most often absent and hardest to add retrospectively.
- Should I use my total weight?
- That is how the position stands express these figures, and it is what the calculator uses. But it is the roughest part of the arithmetic, because body composition matters and total weight cannot see it. For anyone carrying substantial excess weight, scaling to a target weight or to lean body mass is common practice and gives a considerably lower number. Which approach fits you is a conversation with a dietitian rather than something a dropdown can decide.
- Is more protein better?
- Not indefinitely, and this calculator cannot answer it for you. The published ranges have upper ends for a reason - beyond them the evidence for additional benefit thins out, while the protein is displacing other things you might have eaten. High intakes are generally well tolerated by healthy people, which is a sentence containing two conditions a calculator cannot check. Kidney function in particular is a real medical consideration, and it is one to raise with a doctor rather than resolve with a formula.
- Does timing matter?
- Less than the total, and much less than people used to think. The old idea of a narrow window immediately after training has been substantially walked back; what the evidence supports better is spreading intake reasonably evenly across the day rather than taking most of it in one meal. That is a large part of why the per-meal output is here - it nudges toward distribution without requiring you to think about timing at all.
Take it further with AI
Copy this into ChatGPT or Claude with your own numbers filled in. It hands over the figures this calculator worked out, so the answer is built on real arithmetic instead of a guess.
I used the Protein Intake Calculator at https://www.bfcbrilliance.com/tools/protein-intake-calculator.
What I entered:
- Body weight (lb): ___
- What you actually do: ___
- Meals per day (meals): ___
What it calculated:
- Protein per day: ___
- Per meal: ___
- Your weight in kg: ___
- The RDA would be: ___
- Your target vs the RDA: ___
Use those figures as given — they are already worked out, so please don't recalculate or estimate your own. Help me turn them into a plan: what to buy or do, in what order, roughly what it should cost, and the mistakes people most often make with this job.
Keep this general and do not give medical advice — where it matters, tell me what to raise with a clinician.Last updated
Get the next tool.
New tools and guides straight to your inbox. No spam, ever.
Part of a bigger job
How to Set Up Your Nutrition NumbersCalories, protein, macros and water in the order they depend on each other — and four widely-quoted figures that turn out to be minimums, not targets.
Walks through all 7 nutrition tools in order.